Notes on... A New Birth of Freedom by Harry Jaffa. copyright 2000. ISBN 0-8467-9952-8; Suspicion & Faith by Merold Westphal. Copyright 1998. ISBN 13:978-0-8232-1876-9; Fellow Teachers by Philip Rieff Copyright 1972 ISBN 0-06-013554-9 The Conservative Foundation of the Liberal Order by Daniel J. Mahoney Copyright 2011, ISBN 978-1-935191-00-1
Showing posts with label moral_moderates. Show all posts
Showing posts with label moral_moderates. Show all posts
Thursday, October 27, 2011
p. 307-308 A New Birth of Freedom, Jaffa
How does Jaffa argue that 1854 was a more grave crisis than even the Civil War itself?
Labels:
Douglas,
moral_moderates,
New_Birth_of_Freedom
Monday, October 24, 2011
p. 296-297 A New Birth of Freedom, Jaffa
H.D. Thoreau and the abolitionists shared a political philosophy with Taney--what was it, and how did it put these opposites on the same side?
Labels:
common_moral_binding,
compact,
Modern_Left_fllw_Taney,
moral_moderates,
New_Birth_of_Freedom,
relativism
Tuesday, September 27, 2011
p. xi-xiii The Conservative Foundation of the Liberal Order, Mahoney
What are the three terms, and how do they related to Jaroslav Pelikan and Mr. Emerson in Room with a View? (hint: Bach's Mass in B Minor)
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
p. 202 & 205 A New Birth of Freedom, Jaffa
Describe the split in the Democratic Party Convention held in Charleston, South Carolina in May, 1860. Note that the Democrat Buchanan rejected the successionist ideas of Jefferson Davis, seemed indifferent to slavery in the name of "the law," and counseled restraint above all else.
p. 205 Lincoln argued that the Union stood in the same relationship to the state as a state to a county, which fits with both Buchanan and Madison. Davis, on the other hand, inherited Calhoun's theory of undivided state sovereignty, which meant that an individual was bound by his promise to his state but not by his promise to the nation.
An argument: Slavery was doomed if left to popular sovereignty (this is the reason Stephen Douglas split the Democratic Party); with the new territories there would eventually be enough votes for a Constitutional Amendment against it. Calhoun understood that the South depended entirely upon favorable rulings in the Courts for slavery's survival, such as that provided by Justice Roger Taney in Dred Scott. This is much like gay marriage today where the gay marriage movement fails whenever it is left to popular vote, but survives only by way of judicial activists in the tradition of Taney.
p. 205 Lincoln argued that the Union stood in the same relationship to the state as a state to a county, which fits with both Buchanan and Madison. Davis, on the other hand, inherited Calhoun's theory of undivided state sovereignty, which meant that an individual was bound by his promise to his state but not by his promise to the nation.
An argument: Slavery was doomed if left to popular sovereignty (this is the reason Stephen Douglas split the Democratic Party); with the new territories there would eventually be enough votes for a Constitutional Amendment against it. Calhoun understood that the South depended entirely upon favorable rulings in the Courts for slavery's survival, such as that provided by Justice Roger Taney in Dred Scott. This is much like gay marriage today where the gay marriage movement fails whenever it is left to popular vote, but survives only by way of judicial activists in the tradition of Taney.
Labels:
Buchanan,
Calhoun,
gay_marriage,
Modern_Left_fllw_Taney,
moral_moderates,
New_Birth_of_Freedom,
states_rights
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)